KATHERINE KNIGHT - The black knight of Aberdeen

SYNOPSIS

KATHERINE KNIGHT

Katherine Mary Knight, born on October 24, 1955, was convicted of the brutal murder of her partner and de facto husband, John Charles Thomas Price, who was born on January 6, 1955. The murder occurred in February 2000, and Knight received her sentencing on November 9, 2001. Currently, Knight is incarcerated at the Silverwater Women’s Correctional Centre in New South Wales. Notably, she became the first Australian woman to be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the most severe punishment under Australian law. Her prison records indicate that she is deemed unfit for release. This is the unsettling tale of Katherine, also known as “The Black Knight” of Aberdeen.

Unfortunately, another case of victim-turned-perpetrator if her testimony is to be believed. One of the reasons I started researching crime and mainly serial killers was my insatiable curiosity to find out why these people cross that line. What makes serial killers different from the rest of the world? Is it Nature or nurture? Since I started looking into these cases when I was a teenager, things have moved along since then. We do know more about psychopathic killers although it still remains pretty much a mystery.

My first thoughts on Katherine Knight before I really looked into her case was to wonder if by being an abattoir worker, was she somewhat desensitised to cutting up flesh. Through my research on serial killers, the one thing that was quite common with many serial killers who dismember was their distaste for doing it the first time. Not all of them got pure pleasure out of dismembering their victims. Sometimes, the reason for doing this was purely for disposal purposes. Not for fun or even consumption – no matter what we want to believe. If you watched my intro video for this channel, you will see that I referred to the Kelleher Typology that lists the different categories of killers. I would say (without knowing much about Katherine Knight at this point) that she falls into the Revenge Killer category. Let’s see if I am right…

It’s estimated that 1 in every 100 individuals is a full-blown psychopath, with many more teetering on the borderline, often excelling in the workplace at the expense of others. They typically wield power through fear and intimidation—two classic traits of psychopathy. Notably, psychopathy cannot be cured, as it’s rooted in the brain’s wiring, particularly the frontal lobe responsible for regulating emotions. Recent advancements in neuroscience, particularly the advent of neuroimaging techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have significantly advanced our understanding of psychopathy. A recent study involving researchers from Nanyang Technological University (NTU Singapore), the University of Pennsylvania, and California State University has shed light on a biological distinction between psychopaths and non-psychopaths. Using MRI scans, scientists found that the striatum, a region of the forebrain, was 10% larger in individuals with psychopathic traits compared to a control group with minimal or no psychopathic tendencies.

While I lack the professional qualifications to diagnose psychopathy or Narcissistic Personality Disorder, I can offer my perspective based on experience and research. I believe Katherine Knight exhibits narcissistic traits, a view shared by other experts. It’s important to note the distinction between narcissism as a personality trait and Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which is a formally diagnosed condition requiring evaluation by a mental health professional. Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of conscience or empathy, along with traits such as grandiosity, manipulation, and arrogance—traits that also align with narcissism. While all psychopaths may display narcissistic traits, not all narcissists are psychopaths. FBI Criminal Profiler Dr. Mary-Ellen O’Toole and Clinical Psychologist Dr. Leah Giarratano both identify Knight as a psychopath, emphasizing the role of both nature and nurture in shaping her behavior. Childhood abuse and genetic factors likely contributed to her development into someone capable of such horrific acts. While Knight’s childhood was marked by darkness and violence, her early homicidal tendencies suggest a troubling pattern of abuse-to-abuser dynamics.

KNIGHT'S CHILDHOOD

To delve into the backstory, we must journey back to a place known as The Upper Hunter Valley, a quiet mining and farming town near Aberdeen in New South Wales, Australia. Prior to March 1, 2000, this tranquil corner of Australia, located on the New England Highway approximately 266 kilometers north-northwest of Sydney, with a population of 1,750, was renowned as the birthplace of the kelpie, the beloved canine icon deeply ingrained in Australian folklore alongside the emu, koala, and kangaroo. However, its reputation changed dramatically. Nowadays, Aberdeen is infamous as the residence of Katherine Knight, arguably the most heinous figure in Australia’s grim history of homicide. Visitors to Aberdeen are now drawn to the single-story, three-bedroom bungalow at number 84 Andrews Street, where a murder and other unspeakable acts occurred, prompting contemplation on what drove this seemingly ordinary middle-aged housewife, mother, and grandmother to commit such atrocities.

She was born and raised in an unconventional and dysfunctional family environment. Her mother, Barbara Roughan. Her mother, Barbara Roughan had been married to Jack Roughan and lived with him in the small town of Aberdeen in New South Wales’ Hunter Valley. They had four sons, Patrick, Martin, Neville and Barry, before Barbara began an adulterous relationship with Ken Knight, a friend and co-worker of her then-husband. Local backlash forced Barbara and Ken to move to Moree. None of her sons went with her; the two eldest boys, Patrick and Martin, continued to reside with their father and the two younger sons, Neville and Barry were sent to be raised by an aunt in Sydney. Barbara had four additional children with Ken, including 2 boys Charlie and Shane and twin girls born on 24th October, 1955 in Tenworth hospital, Tenterfield; Katherine Knight was one of these twin daughters, half an hour younger than her twin sister, Joy. In 1959, when Knight was four, Jack Roughan died and his two older boys, who had been living with him, moved in with Barbara and Ken. Ken Knight was an abattoir slaughterman who travelled with his family throughout Queensland and New South Wales applying his back-breaking trade in 12-hour shifts at Wallangarra, Gunnedah, Tenterfield and Moree and wherever the work was to be found. Ken and Barbara and their six children eventually settled in Aberdeen in 1969 where there was steady work at the local abattoir. From all accounts young Katherine was a loving little girl who was kind to animals, and her only brush with retribution was as a 13-year-old when she appeared before the Children’s Court on a minor charge and received a good behaviour bond. Ken Knight was also a violent alcoholic who would rape Barbara several times a day. Barbara, in turn, often told her daughters intimate details of her sex life and how much she hated sex and men. Later, when Katherine complained to her mother that one of her partners wanted her to take part in a sex act she did not want to perform, Barbara told her to “put up with it and stop complaining.” Katherine claims she was frequently sexually assaulted by several members of her family (though not by her father), which continued until she was aged 11. Although there are doubts about the details, psychiatrists accept her claims and the events have been largely confirmed by other members of the family. Katherine was by all accounts a pleasant girl who experienced uncontrollably murderous rages in response to minor upsets. According to clinical psychologist, Dr Leah Giarratano, Knight had already dissociated at the age of 3 due to the violence around her. She learned to defend herself in a way that cut off emotions and the growing thus maturing of emotions. At school, she was known for her violent temper.

Barbara’s great-grandmother, hailing from the Moree area, was an Indigenous Australian who had married an Irishman. Barbara took pride in this ancestry and identified herself as Aboriginal. However, due to prevalent racism in the area at the time, Barbara’s Indigenous heritage was kept hidden within the family, leading to tension among the children. Besides her twin sister, the only person Katherine was close to was her uncle, Oscar Knight, a champion horseman. His tragic death in 1969 deeply affected Katherine, who claims to still experience visits from his ghost. The family returned to Aberdeen the same year.

During her time at Muswellbrook High School, Katherine became increasingly isolated, earning a reputation as a bully who intimidated smaller children. She was involved in at least one incident where she assaulted a boy with a weapon and was once injured by a teacher – who was subsequently found to have acted in self-defense. Despite these outbursts, Knight displayed exemplary behavior when not consumed by rage, often receiving awards for her good conduct.

LUST FOR KNIVES

After leaving school at the age of 15, Katherine Knight, without having acquired basic literacy skills, found employment as a cutter in a clothing factory. Within a year, she transitioned to what she considered her “dream job” – working alongside her father, twin sister Joy, and brother Charlie at the local abattoir, The Aberdeen Abattoir Makeworks. Given her upbringing in such an environment, it’s unsurprising that Knight harbored a lifelong aspiration to work in abattoirs, considering that there was always a meatworks wherever she lived.

Knight took a keen interest in her work at the abattoir, often observing the start of the production line where pigs were slaughtered. While some coworkers found her fascination with the process peculiar, they assumed she was merely interested in different aspects of the job. However, others noticed Knight’s peculiar approach, noting her apparent enjoyment in certain aspects of the work. She would deliberately nick arteries of the animals to witness the flow of blood, deriving a malevolent pleasure from death. It is believed that her job at the abattoir provided an outlet for her bloodlust, serving as her metaphorical killing field.

This raises an intriguing question: If Knight had not been employed at the abattoir, would she have committed the crime in the manner that she did?

After swiftly advancing to the position of boning, Katherine was equipped with her own set of butchers’ knives, marking the beginning of her enduring fascination with blades. In the predominantly male environment of the abattoir, she proved herself as tough as any of her male counterparts, engaging in the colorful and coarse boning-floor banter without hesitation. Known for her refusal to back down, she was quick to confront anyone who offended her, often challenging them to armed combat to settle disputes, a challenge no one dared to accept.

Katherine’s most cherished possessions were her razor-sharp boning knives, which she kept prominently displayed above her bed, ensuring they were always within reach in case of need. This habit persisted throughout her life, until her eventual incarceration. It’s fair to suggest that this period in her life played a significant role in shaping the violent tendencies that would eventually define Katherine Knight.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE #1 - Marriage to David

Katherine Knight first encountered David Stanford Kellett, a heavy drinker, in 1973, and quickly asserted dominance over him. Kellett’s drinking habits stemmed from two traumatic incidents during his previous railway job in Coffs Harbour: witnessing his best friend’s death in a shunting accident and rescuing injured occupants of a school bus struck by a train, resulting in the deaths of six children. Eventually, Kellett lost his job due to declining behavior and performance but found employment at the nearby Aberdeen abattoir, where he became acquainted with Knight’s brother.

Knight often intervened to support Kellett in fights, using her fists if necessary, earning her a reputation in Aberdeen for physical intimidation against those who crossed her. Knight initiated marriage with Kellett in 1974, with the couple arriving at the service on her motorcycle, Kellett visibly intoxicated as the pillion passenger. Upon their arrival, Knight’s mother, Barbara, offered Kellett some advice:

“The old girl said to me to watch out. ‘You better watch this one or she’ll fucking kill you. Stir her up the wrong way or do the wrong thing and you’re fucked, don’t ever think of playing up on her, she’ll fuckin’ kill you.’ And that was her mother talking! She told me she’s got something loose, She’s got a screw loose somewhere.”

On their wedding night, Knight and Kellett engaged in intimacy three times. However, Kellett’s mistake of falling asleep without meeting Knight’s expectations, which she believed were set by her parents’ alleged five times on their wedding night, led to a disturbing turn of events. Knight woke Kellett abruptly, her hands around his throat, attempting to strangle him. Despite his struggle, Kellett managed to fend her off. This incident marked just the beginning of a tumultuous marriage that endured for ten more years.

The union, though, was marred by imperfections. Kellett’s infidelity was a recurring issue, and he once abandoned Knight and their two daughters abruptly in the dead of night.

Their daughter, Melissa, was born on May 11, 1976. However, by this time, David was involved with other women. Just six weeks after Melissa’s birth, Knight attempted to stab David with a broken beer bottle. Fed up with her violent outbursts, Kellett decided to leave for Queensland with his new girlfriend after only two years of marriage. The following day, witnesses observed Knight storming down the main street, visibly agitated, pushing her newborn in a pram, and violently swinging it from side to side. At one point, she appeared to almost push the pram into oncoming traffic. Concerned bystanders contacted the police, leading to Knight’s admission to St. Elmo’s Hospital in Tamworth. There, she was diagnosed with postnatal depression, treated with antidepressants, and spent several weeks recuperating. Despite her release, Knight’s anger showed no signs of abating, and her husband remained absent.

Still consumed by anger, Knight then left her baby daughter, Melissa, on the railway tracks and walked away, knowing that the next train was due any minute. The owner of a nearby kiosk witnessed this, but it was “Old Ted,” a local forager near the railway line, who emerged as the hero, rescuing Melissa just moments before the train passed. However, Knight’s violent outburst didn’t end there. She proceeded to steal an axe from a backyard, brandishing it in town in a threatening manner, waving it around her head and menacing several people randomly. Knight was subsequently arrested and taken to St. Elmo’s Psychiatric Hospital, only to sign herself out the following day. There are some discrepancies in the timelines reported in various articles, highlighting the sensationalism and embellishment often found in media coverage. Nonetheless, it is clear that Knight’s behavior was deeply disturbing and warranted intervention. Some accounts suggest that she had also been diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder at this point, and despite medical professionals’ inability to provide further treatment, she was released. Days later, Knight experienced another breakdown, prompting questions about why she hadn’t been committed earlier given the severity of her actions.

A few days later, Knight’s fury toward her husband’s absence escalated. Leaving her baby daughter at home, she approached a neighbor’s door, claiming her child was ill and urgently needed to be taken to the hospital. Knight returned home while the neighbor, accompanied by her own children, drove to Knight’s residence to collect baby Melissa. One of the neighbor’s daughters entered the house with Knight to retrieve Melissa from her cot. Suddenly, Knight brandished a knife and pursued the girl out of the house, even managing to inflict a slash to her face. Knight then held the family hostage and demanded to be taken to David’s mother’s house. During the journey, Knight’s neighbor, who was bleeding profusely, persuaded her to stop at a service station under the guise of allowing one of the boys, who was asthmatic, to disembark. The boy seized the opportunity to alert the police. Responding to the urgent call from the petrol station owner, police encountered Katherine holding a young boy by his shirtfront, brandishing a knife. Using brooms at hand, the officers managed to disarm Knight and apprehend her when she released the child. Instead of facing charges, Knight was admitted to the Morisset Psychiatric Hospital once again. She expressed to the nurses her intention to kill the service station mechanic who had repaired Kellett’s car, facilitating his departure, as well as her husband and his mother upon reaching Queensland. Meanwhile, David Kellett, then employed as a truck driver in Queensland, was informed of his wife’s confinement in a psychiatric ward. Accompanied by his mother Jean, Kellett made the journey to support his troubled wife, who visibly brightened upon seeing him. On August 9, 1976, Katherine was released into the care of her mother-in-law under the condition that Jean ensure she adhered to her medication regimen. David then drove Knight and his mother to Aberdeen to reunite with their daughter Melissa. As they arrived, Knight’s mother, Barbara, emerged from the house and attempted to strangle David through the car window. Witnessing this, Knight intervened, knocking her mother to the ground and potentially saving David’s life. It became apparent that mother and daughter shared a propensity for violence. Within a short time, Knight and Kellett relocated to Woodridge, near Ipswich, just west of Brisbane, Queensland, where they settled into a rented bungalow to start afresh. Kellett pursued truck driving while Knight secured a job at the Dinmore meatworks in Ipswich.

But it was only to be the beginning of a life of attacking people who got in her way.

But what I also find very disturbing is that other family members witnessed abuse and they never said anything. David Kellet’s sister, Sandy, lived with them for a while and actually got to know Katherine. And according to Sandy, although she was prone to flying off the handle for no apparent reason, she was lovely and charming. Sandy once caught Knight trying to put her daughter’s hand under scorching hot running water in the bathroom. She then told David what she saw and he made her promise not to say anything to Knight on that evening because she will kill both of us in our sleep. In 1979, David found Katherine in bed with another man and begging for one more chance, she and David moved to Landsborough where Katherine convinced David of having another baby.

While pregnant with their second child, Katherine confronted David as he returned late from the pub, celebrating a Darts competition victory. Enraged, she struck him on the head with a skillet, fracturing his skull. David managed to stagger to a neighbor’s house before collapsing, leading to a week-long hospitalization. Meanwhile, Katherine proceeded to incinerate all of his belongings in the bathtub. Although the police encouraged David to press charges, Katherine convinced him otherwise, citing “the sake of the children.”

As Katherine’s violence escalated and David’s fear heightened, their relationship grew increasingly volatile. Katherine’s explosive rages became more frequent and intense, leading her to attack her husband with her fists, kitchen appliances, and any other objects within reach. Despite the turmoil, they welcomed another daughter, Natasha Maree, on March 6, 1980.

David Kellett’s testimony during her murder trial highlighted Katherine’s unpredictable and violently volatile nature, a description echoed by many who knew her. On one occasion, a police officer became her victim, stabbed by Knight, yet she faced no charges due to her notorious reputation. Kellett vividly recalled another chilling incident: waking to find Katherine straddling his chest, a knife perilously close to his throat. Her laughter only emphasized how easily she could have ended his life.

Another instance of Knight’s unprovoked violence occurred during an altercation with 16-year-old Margaret Macbeth. In the heat of the argument, Knight inflicted severe cuts across Margaret’s face, resulting in her hospitalization and the need for stitches. Subsequently, Knight was interviewed by the police and admitted to Morriset psychiatric hospital for evaluation. Throughout this ordeal, she spun tales of victimhood to garner sympathy from anyone willing to listen.

In 1984, following numerous violent episodes instigated by Katherine, David returned home from work to find the house devoid of any sign of Knight. She had vanished, taking everything with her except for a worn-out sofa. Knight had relocated back to Aberdeen, initially staying with her parents before securing a rental house on McQueen Street near Muswellbrook. Despite her return to work at the abattoir she adored, Knight suffered a back injury the following year, prompting her to transition to a disability pension. With no need to reside close to her workplace, Knight was allocated a Housing Commission residence in Aberdeen by the government.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE #2 - David Saunders

In 1986, now using her maiden name, Knight encountered David Saunders, a 38-year-old miner and former speedway driver. Saunders swiftly moved in with Knight and her daughters, though he retained his apartment in Scone. Despite initially enjoying a brief honeymoon period, Saunders described Knight’s jealousy and erratic behavior, often leading to their tumultuous relationship. Saunders, described by his ex-wife and others as a gentle and courteous man who enjoyed drinking, frequently faced Knight’s suspicions and confrontations about his activities in her absence. This cycle of expulsion and reconciliation characterized their relationship. In May 1987, Knight gruesomely killed Saunders’ two-month-old dingo pup before him, using it as a chilling warning against infidelity. Knight claimed she did so in retaliation for being assaulted during their altercations, purportedly while pregnant, although the timeline suggests otherwise. Additionally, some sources allege Knight rendered Saunders unconscious with a frying pan after the dog’s killing, but this detail remains unconfirmed amidst conflicting reports.

In June 1988, Knight welcomed her third daughter, Sarah, prompting Saunders to secure an old weatherboard cottage in Aberdeen. Knight, using her worker’s compensation payout in 1989, cleared the home’s mortgage, marking her first significant asset. Reflecting her lifelong passion, Knight adorned the walls with an array of dead animals, including cow hides, water buffalo horns, and deer antlers. The decor featured stuffed peacocks and baby deer alongside a variety of rustic implements and leather apparel, creating a macabre museum of Knight’s fantasies. However, this eerie ambiance soon turned violent when Knight attacked Saunders one night, branding his face with a hot iron and subsequently stabbing him with scissors, citing his tardiness as the cause. Later, she brandished a shotgun at her sister’s house, falsely claiming she had killed Saunders—a chilling rehearsal for potential future actions, according to clinical psychologist Dr. Leah Giarratano. Despite several attempts to leave Knight, Saunders faced violent reprisals each time, including the destruction of his clothes and a suicide attempt by Knight. Fleeing to Newcastle, Saunders took refuge, severing ties with Knight. Upon returning to see his daughter, Saunders discovered Knight had maliciously portrayed him to the police, resulting in an unjustified Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) preventing him from seeing his child.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE #3 - John Chillingworth

Katherine Knight wasted no time in starting a new relationship, and within a few months, she was already expecting a child. The father was John Chillingworth, a local recovering alcoholic employed at the Aberdeen meatworks. Their son, Eric, was born in 1991. Details about Knight’s relationship with Chillingworth are scarce, except for one violent incident where Chillingworth admitted to striking Knight once after she had pushed him beyond his limit, causing his glasses to fly off his face and breaking his false teeth. Their relationship lasted three years and ended after Chillingworth discovered Knight’s affair with John Charles Thomas Price. It appears that Knight initiated the end of her relationship with Chillingworth to pursue Price, a decision that ultimately proved disastrous for Price.

JOHN PRICE

John Charles Thomas Price, known affectionately as Pricey, was the father of three children when Knight began an affair with him. Widely regarded as a “terrific bloke” by those who knew him, Price had ended his own marriage in 1988. While one of his children remained with his former wife, the two older children, a teenage boy and girl, lived with him. Price was fully aware of Knight’s violent tendencies when she moved into his house in 1995. Residing in a three-bedroom brick bungalow on St. Andrews Street in Aberdeen, Price earned a respectable income from his work in the local mines. Despite the rumors surrounding Knight’s treatment of her partners, Price chose to overlook them. He affectionately referred to Knight as “the speckled hen”. However, like her previous relationships, Knight’s dynamic with Price soon turned tumultuous. In an attempt to coerce Price into marriage, Knight resorted to stealing his money and purchasing her own engagement ring. When Price refused to marry her in 1998, Knight sought revenge by filming items she claimed he had stolen from work and sending the tape to his employer. Although the items were outdated medical kits scavenged from the company’s rubbish tip, Price lost his job of seventeen years as a result. Enraged by Knight’s actions, Price expelled her from his home, leading to a brief separation. Despite this, they reconciled, albeit with Knight forbidden from moving in with him. Their conflicts escalated, alienating Price from his friends, and causing tension with his children, whom Knight accused of molesting her own. Knight’s threats against Price’s life were no secret, and tensions reached a breaking point when she fatally stabbed him. Reports suggest that Knight’s discovery of Price’s will, leaving his assets to his ex-wife and children, further fueled her rage, prompting her demand for $10,000 to leave. Amidst the chaos, Knight even revealed to one of Price’s daughters that he was not her biological father. Knight’s violent tendencies extended beyond Price, as recounted by his children, who recalled instances where she endangered lives by driving recklessly and made disturbing requests, such as instructing her nephew to vandalize Price’s car and attack him with battery acid.

PRICE'S MURDER

Brace yourselves here, because this is where it starts to get really gruesome.

Days before Knight killed Price, on the 27th February, they had a huge fight that resulted in the police being called. Price wanted the police to remove Knight from his home. The police, however, informed Price that they could not do anything without a court order. The poor man must have been going out of his mind. He needed a court order to remove the woman who eventually kills him within days from his own house!! It is believed that this action was what spurred Knight into planning his murder for real. Again, the details leading up to Price’s murder vary slightly depending on which article or documentary you watch so I have minimised the fine details and tried to piece together what fits into the timeline.

On Tuesday, the 29th of February, John Price stopped at the Scone Magistrate’s Court in an attempt to take out an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) which is basically a restraining order. It does pretty much the same thing. In Australia, depending on the state, these can have different names but they are fundamentally the same. I don’t know if he actually succeeded because some sources say that he was told it would take weeks, so I am assuming he applied and walked out of the court with nothing physical in his hand but knowing that the lengthy process had been put into action. That afternoon, Price told his co-workers that if he did not come to work the next day, it would be because Knight had murdered him. He had even shown them previous stab wounds that Knight had incurred. Despite their pleas that Price should not return home, he stated that he was afraid Knight would kill his children if he did not. At this point, it seems that Price knew what was coming and he was very afraid. He had every reason to be. Price arrived home to find that Knight, although not there herself, had sent the children away for a sleep-over at a friend’s house. He then spent the evening with his neighbours before returning home and going to bed around 11 pm.

Earlier that day, Knight had videotaped all her children while making comments which have since been interpreted as a crude will. She later arrived at Price’s house while he was sleeping and sat watching television for a while before taking a shower. She then changed into new black lingerie which she had bought earlier that day. She then woke Price and they had sex, after which he fell asleep. And that is when she struck. Taking the butcher’s knife that she had next to the bed and stabbed him while he was sleeping. According to the blood evidence, he awoke and tried to turn the light on before attempting to escape while Knight chased him through the house. He managed to open the front door and get outside, but he either stumbled back inside or was dragged back by Knight into the hallway, where he finally died after bleeding out. She had stabbed him 37 times, in both the front and back of his body. Price’s autopsy revealed that many of the wounds extended into vital organs. But if you think it ends there, then you are mistaken. Because here is the truly horrific part of all of this. We know by now that Katherine Knight was willing and more than capable of stabbing someone to death and it was, in my opinion, inevitable. No surprise there. But what she does next is off the fucking charts.

SCENE OF HORROR

Once John was dead, Knight then methodically proceeded to skin the corpse, taking off the entire skin, including the face, ears, scalp, genitals and neck like a macabre skin suit. She only left a small inch square of skin on the body. The square had the scar from where she had stabbed him previously. Knight peeled Price’s body with such expertise and precision that she was able to leave the entire skin intact, including Price’s nose, ears, genitals, mouth, and hair. Medical officials reported that Knight had removed Price’s skin in an experienced manner, allowing them to later reattach the skin to his body prior to the funeral service. They also estimated the time needed to do this would have been around 40 minutes. The skin suit, something harking back to the thriller Silence of the Lambs, was then hung up via a meat hook on the architrave of a door to the lounge room. Was this meat hook already screwed into the frame? Did Knight put this in after she killed Price or before? The amount of thought that goes into doing something like that is somewhat surprising. Maybe I’m just overthinking or is it too-much thinking? One of the 2.

Once the skin had been removed, Knight then continued to defile the body of her lover by chopping off the skinned head and cooking it in a big pot on the stove. Knight then peeled and chopped up various vegetables, potato, pumpkin, beets, zucchini, cabbage, squash as well as gravy and along with slices she removed from the man’s buttocks (these she baked in the oven) served them up as steak and vegetables for his 2 children, Jonathan and Beck, along with nameplates and spiteful notes placed next to each serving. Knight took her time painstakingly defiling his body. Her seemingly enjoyment of killing and torturing the dead body put her down as one of the cruellest in the annals of Australia’s criminal history. Half-discarded pieces of meat were later found in the backyard leading the police to speculate as to whether she had tried to eat the flesh and couldn’t.

Sometime later, Knight arranged the skinned body of John Price with the left arm draped over an empty 1.25-litre soft drink bottle with his legs crossed. This was claimed in court to be an act of defilement demonstrating Knight’s contempt for Price. Knight had left a handwritten note on top of a photograph of Price. Bloodstained and covered with small pieces of flesh, it read: “Time got you back Johathon for rapping [raping] my douter [daughter]. You to Beck [Price’s daughter] for Ross – for Little John [his son]. Now play with little Johns dick John Price. (sic)” The accusations in the note were found to be groundless.

At around 2-3 in the morning, Knight drove into Aberdeen and withdrew $1,000 from Price’s bank account at an ATM. In her final act of “woe is me”, she lay down on the bed, swallowed a bunch of pills, later claiming she had attempted suicide and passed out. This is how the police found her the next day.

At 6 am the next day, a neighbour became concerned that Price’s car was still in the driveway, and when he did not arrive at work, his employer sent a worker to see what was wrong. Both the neighbour and the worker tried knocking on Price’s bedroom window to wake him, but they alerted police after noticing blood on the front door. Breaking down the back door, police found Price’s body, with Knight comatose from taking a large number of pills. The pot on the stove with John Price’s head in it was still warm when the police discovered it, estimated to be at between 40 and 50 °C (104 and 122 °F), indicating that the cooking had taken place in the early morning.

When the police broke into the house the next day and walked into the hallway, they initially thought that someone had hung a curtain in the doorway. It wasn’t until they got closer that they realised it was John’s skin. It was then that they saw his skinless, headless torso on the floor of the living room. There was blood and bits of flesh everywhere. They then heard snoring from the bedroom. Katherine was unresponsive on the bed surrounded by pill bottles.

Police officers made the following report after arriving at the house the next day:

“About 6am on Wednesday March 1st, a neighbour noticed that the victim’s (John Price) work utility truck was still at his home. This appeared unusual as the victim normally had left for work each day prior to this time. This neighbor became concerned as did the employer of the victim who was by this time making inquiries as to why the victim had not attended work. Attempts were made by the neighbour and another friend to wake the victim by knocking on his bedroom window. The neighbour and friend then went to the front door where they saw a small amount of blood on the wooden exterior. Police were contacted and attended about 8am. The police at the scene forced entry to the house through the rear door. Upon entry the police located the victim’s exterior layers of skin hanging from a hook in a doorway arch into the lounge room. They then located the victim’s decapitated remains on the lounge room floor near a small foyer leading to the front door. A further search of the house by police resulted in them locating Katherine Knight who was snoring loudly in a comatose condition on a double bed at the end of the house. She was removed from the house immediately by police and later conveyed to hospital by ambulance.”

DETECTIVE MUSCIO

Keep bracing yourselves… The worst is yet to come. I am an all or nothing kind of girl. When I do these videos, I include everything. The following account is the complete report by crime scene investigator Detective Senior Constable Peter Anthony Muscio who was the first officer on the premises after the initial discovery of John Price’s body. In cases such as this, it is the detective’s job to piece together the facts first hand from the evidence at the murder scene before anyone else touches a thing; and believe me, what he saw that day with his own eyes is something I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.

“About 10am, Wednesday the 1st of March, 2000, in company with Detective Sergeant Neil Raymond, I attended the premises at 84 St Andrews Street, Aberdeen in relation to an alleged homicide. There I spoke to a number of police including duty officer Graham Furlonger, Detective Sergeant Bob Wells and Senior Constable Michael Prentice. The premises is a single storey, three bedroom dwelling which faces generally south onto St Andrew Street. The premises was built towards the eastern side of the block leaving a grassed area on the western side where three vehicles were parked. These vehicles consisted of a white Toyota 4WD, a white Ford sedan and a white Toyota Landcruiser utility. There were two galvanised steel garden sheds in the rear yard, one at each rear corner. There was also a brick barbeque against the eastern boundary. The dwelling had a full length verandah across the southern side and a smaller verandah central to the rear of the premises. My attention was drawn to a piece of cooked meat on the rear lawn in front of the white Ford sedan. I made an examination of this piece of meat and collected it for further testing. During my examination I took a series of photographs of the premises and the piece of cooked meat on the lawn.

“I entered the premises to conduct a cursory examination with Detective Sgt Raymond. I walked in through the rear door and into the kitchen. Once inside the kitchen I saw a large section of what appeared to be human skin hanging from the top architrave of the doorway leading into the lounge room. This piece of skin extended from the top of the doorway right to the floor and appeared to be an entire human skin. Looking through this doorway into the lounge room I could see a headless and skinless human body. I walked east along the hallway and looked into the entry foyer and saw an extreme amount of blood pooled on the floor. There was also a large amount of blood smearing over the eastern wall of the entry. I walked further east along the hallway and noticed some blood staining leading from the main bedroom. In this bedroom I noticed more blood staining however only moderate amounts. I then left the scene and had a discussion with Sergeant Raymond and other investigating police outside the scene. I then re-entered the premises and made a more detailed examination.

The rear door of the premises opens into the laundry, off the western side of this is the kitchen dining room. The laundry contained a stainless steel tub in the north east corner and a washing machine further south along the eastern wall. There was a built-in cupboard in two separate wooden louvred doors in the southern wall of the laundry. On the western wall of the laundry was a cavity sliding door that gave access to the dining room and kitchen. The room was divided into two sections with the kitchen being the western end and the dining room being the eastern end. The dining room contained a wood and steel dining room table which had three matching seats placed around it. There were items of clothing draped over the backs of each of the three chairs. On the dining room table was a tool bag, some clothing, a small blue folder, an electronic toy gorilla and some prescription medicine boxes.

I noticed blood staining to the shoulder area of a blue shirt which was draped over the chair on the western side of the table. The medication on the table consisted of three boxes of Felodur ER 5mg of which two were empty. This medication normally contains 2 strips of each containing 15 tablets, however there was only one full strip containing 15 tablets. There was also one empty box of Prinivil 20 tablets. An empty box of Dapa-Tabs was also on the table, this medication when full contains 90 tablets at 2.5mg. The fourth chair of the set was against the northern wall under the bench portion of the breakfast bar. I took a series of photographs of the dining room. The kitchen was in the east portion of the room. It consisted of a kitchen bench with overhead cupboards along the eastern wall. About central to this bench was an electric cooktop which had a baking dish and an aluminium boiler on it. A long the southern wall was a wall oven and further east was a two door built-in pantry and a freestanding fridge. Along the northern wall was another bench which incorporated the sink and further east was a breakfast bar that protruded from the northern wall south into the kitchen and divided the kitchen and dining room.

As mentioned earlier I saw what appeared to be a complete human skin or pelt hanging from the top architrave of the door separating the dining room and the lounge room. On closer examination I could distinguish black curly hair at the top, a nose and part of the mouth and ear. About halfway down the pelt I could see a clump of short black curly hair consistent with pubic hair. I could not recognise any other particular features as it continued to the floor. The edges of the pelt were incised indicating to me that it had been removed with a sharp instrument. There were also a number of distinct stab wounds to the pelt, about a metre down from the top. The pelt was attached to the architrave by a stainless steel meat hook. The hook was pierced through the top of the head area of the pelt and then hooked over the architrave on the lounge room side of the door. The skin appeared to vary in thickness from approximately 1 to 4 centimetres. I noticed a blood trail leading from the lounge room into the kitchen towards the kitchen cooktop in the vicinity of the aluminium boiler. The boiler was on the right side rear element, which was at the time turned off. When I lifted the lid to the boiler I noticed it was warm to touch.

The pot was full of liquid and on the surface I could identify a skinned human head and a number of cooked vegetables. On the northern side of the aluminium boiler I saw a baking dish which was sitting across the right front side element. Inside the baking dish I saw an amount of liquid and the remains of baked vegetables. Just to the right or northern side of the cook top I saw two prepared meals. Each of the meals consisted of two pieces of cooked meat, baked potato, baked pumpkin, zucchini, cabbage, yellow squash and gravy. Underneath each of the meals was a torn section of kitchen paper with a name written on it. The word “Beaky” was written in blue ink pen on one of the pieces while the word “Jonathon” was on the other. The pieces of meat appeared on the plates were similar to the piece I collected from the rear lawn.

On the section of the kitchen bench across the northern wall were a number of items of interest. On the western end of the bench I saw a green electric jug with blood staining about the handle. In the sink I saw an orange coloured vegetable peeler and the vegetable peelings from potato, pumpkin, zucchini and onion. On the eastern side of the sink I saw a cream coloured microwave dish containing cooked cabbage leaves and a clearish liquid. In front of the microwave dish I saw a brown coloured coffee cup that was sitting on a wooden cutting up board. Inside the coffee cup was a teaspoon and a small quantity of thick brown liquid similar to gravy. There was also the residue of the gravy type substance on the cutting up board. Just to the right of the cutting up board was a yellow handled “Swibo” knife and two forks. The handle of the knife was blood stained.

On the eastern side of the breakfast bar I saw a small black handled knife which was blood stained and four empty medication blister packs. One blister pack was labelled “Luvox” and had 15 tablets missing, two blister packets labelled “Aropax” and had ten tablets missing from each packet and the blister packet labelled Promethazine had 20 tablets missing. I saw a blood stained grey coffee cup which contained a white fatty substance. There was also an empty “Tooheys” brand beer stubby, a packet of Winfield red cigarettes and a black wallet belonging to the deceased on the bench. On the western side of the breakfast bar I saw a “Norton” brand “bench stone” sharpening stone.

On the southern side of the cooktop on the bench against the western wall of the kitchen was a microwave oven. In front of the microwave was the remains of a roll of paper towel and a blue plastic lid. This lid fitted on the microwave dish that was on the kitchen sink. I also noted that the microwave door was open and the courtesy light was on. On the cork tiled floor of the kitchen at the south west corner of the kitchen bench I saw a blood stained bare footprint. This footprint was from a right foot of a person and at the time the person was standing adjacent to the kitchen bench with the right foot facing north.

I noticed blood staining to the fridge on both the handle of the door to the fridge section and the eastern side of the unit. The staining to the door handle contained some ridge structure and was in a position consistent with opening the door with bloodied hands. There were also smears on the eastern face of the fridge, and lower down, staining from droplets of blood that had come in contact with this surface.

As mentioned earlier the lounge room was off the southern side of the kitchen/dining room, the two rooms being separated by a cavity sliding door. On the eastern side of the lounge room was an opening of 1.6m wide which gave the access to the front entry of the premises. The lounge room contained a single seat lounge chair in the south east corner and further west against that wall was a three seater lounge suite, and another single lounge seat in the south west corner. From this corner, north, against the western wall was a slow combustion heater and another single lounge chair. Along the northern wall from the north western corner was a large wooden display cabinet, a smaller display cabinet, the doorway to the kitchen/dining room and single lounge chair in the north eastern corner.

The skinless and headless body of a person now known to me as John Charles Price was in a supine position with his legs protruding into the entry foyer, from knees down. There was a substantial amount of blood smeared over the carpet around the body. As mentioned earlier there was also an extreme amount of blood pooling on the floor of the entry foyer. In this blood pool and staining were marks where the body of the deceased had been dragged about one metre from about the middle of the entry foyer onto the carpet in the lounge room. The deceased was laying on his back with his legs crossed at the feet, the left ankle was on top of the right. His left arm was extended and out from the body at an angle of about 45 degrees. Under the left wrist of this arm was an empty plastic 1.25 litre Shellys Club Lemon Squash bottle. The right arm was also extended and lying alongside the body. On the floor, adjacent to the right arm of the deceased was a blood stained 31 cm yellow plastic handled knife. The blade of this knife was 17.5cm long. The body was virtually devoid of skin and flesh, exposing the muscles and some organs. There were a number of wounds present on the body, one of the most obvious being a stab wound to the left side of the chest which extended into the chest cavity.

As stated the body had been skinned in a manner that leads me to believe that the person responsible would have had skill in this area. From the blood staining on the carpet I was able to determine that the deceased had been skinned prior to being decapitated. there was a definite outline of the head in the blood staining on the carpet. Examination of the neck region of the deceased indicated that the head had been removed very carefully and cleanly with a sharp instrument. On the seat of the single lounge chair in the north east corner of the room (adjacent to the shoulders of the deceased) was a black handled honing steel (sharpening stone) and an opened packet of Winfield Blue cigarettes. I also noticed bloodied hand prints on the back and arms of this chair. On the northern wall on the western side of the door to the kitchen was a small display cabinet. Lying on this cabinet was a broken picture frame containing a picture of the deceased. Lying on top of the picture frame was a blood stained watch. To the west of the photograph, still on top of the cabinet, was a blood stained hand written note together with another broken picture on top of it. Apart from being blood stained it had small pieces of flesh on it.

The note was poorly written and contained very basic spelling mistakes. It read:- “Time got you back Johathon for rapping (raping) my douter (daughter). You to Beck for Ross — for Little John.’ ‘Now play with little Johns Dick John Price.’ (These allegations were baseless.)”

Detective Muscio also said; “I remember walking down the hallway and at about shoulder height there were all these blood splatter marks on the walls. To me, it’s indicative of each attack… He’s absolutely fighting for his life. The bloke’s just had a bonk (sexual intercourse) in the bed when he wakes up, then stab, stab, stab. He’s getting up, there is arterial spurting on the robe and the bed, and on the doorway there’s a bloodied handprint or swipe on the western side of the door near the dressing table, and blood around the light switch. It looks like he’s tried to turn the light switch on. And then all down the hallway they’re (bloody handprints) everywhere. And he’s almost made it, he’s opened the front door, the screen door is shut, there is blood staining, trajectory again, flicking out across the front door, he’s almost made it… but he wouldn’t have survived. He would have been absolutely horrified, terrified — probably terrified more than horrified — trying to get out and all the time being stabbed.”

Staying true to my all or nothing pledge, here is what the autopsy revealed:

The victim was dead when he was skinned. A razor sharp knife had been inserted just under his collarbone and sliced horizontally across the top of the body, from shoulder to shoulder, right under the clavicles. It was a straight, clean cut, anatomically precise. Then the knife was turned and cut down the chest and over the stomach to the pubic hair line and made into a T with another straight line. Tracing the knife tip around his pubic area and careful not to cut his penis or genitals, the killer cut down the front of John Price’s thighs, over the knees and to his feet. The killer then moved up the body, held his arms up and cut down the back of each one and across the top of the victim’s head. The killer then peeled the victim’s skin off, including his head, his hair, his face and all the way down the length of the body to the feet exposing the victim’s intestines. The entire skin was in one piece including hair, face, ears, nose, mouth, genitals and complete stab holes and dripping in blood. Hanging from the S-hook in the doorway, the feet were dragging on the ground. The killer then removed the victim’s head clean at the C3-C4 junction, right at the top of the shoulders using a very sharp knife. The cut was precise and clean. The killer would have been covered in warm, sticky blood. According to forensic pathologist Dr. Timothy Lyons, who performed the autopsy, the whole procedure would have taken about 40 minutes.

Once Knight woke up in hospital, she claimed to have no memory of the night before. Katherine Knight was quickly charged with his murder.

THE TRIAL & VERDICT

Despite rigorous questioning, Katherine Knight maintained she had no recollection of the events following her arrival at the house and her intimate encounter with her lover. Following her recovery from an alleged suicide attempt, on March 6, 2000, Knight was formally charged with the murder of John Price during a special bedside hearing in the psychiatric wing of Maitland District Hospital. Despite her claims of memory loss, incriminating evidence emerged, including withdrawals from Price’s bank account on the night of his death. Moreover, Knight had confided in her brother three weeks prior to the incident, expressing her intention to kill Price and plead insanity. Initially offering to plead guilty to manslaughter, Knight’s proposal was rejected. She was formally arraigned on February 2, 2001, entering a plea of not guilty to the charge of murdering Price. Scheduled for trial on July 23, 2001, the proceedings were adjourned due to her counsel’s illness, with a new date set for October 15, 2001.

When the trial began, Justice Barry O’Keefe offered the 60 potential jurors the option to excuse themselves due to the graphic nature of the evidence, with five choosing to do so. As the witness list was read to the remaining prospects, several more opted out, resulting in the empanelment of the jury. Following discussions between Knight’s attorneys and the judge, the trial was adjourned until the following day. Upon reconvening, Knight unexpectedly changed her plea to guilty, leading to the dismissal of the jury. It was later revealed that Justice O’Keefe had been informed of the plea change the day prior, prompting him to adjourn the trial and order an overnight psychiatric assessment to ascertain Knight’s understanding of the implications of her plea and her mental fitness to make it. Knight’s legal team had intended to mount a defense based on claims of amnesia and dissociation, supported by most psychiatrists, although they also considered her mentally sound. However, two psychiatrists diagnosed Knight with borderline personality disorder. Despite pleading guilty, Knight continued to deny responsibility for her actions. Interestingly, during the sentencing hearing, her lawyers requested that she be shielded from certain details, but the request was denied. When Timothy Lyons testified about the gruesome acts Knight committed against Price, she became hysterical and had to be sedated. Throughout the trial, Dr. Milton, a leading criminal psychologist in Australia, presented his findings after interviewing Knight, asserting that she suffered from borderline personality disorder but was fully aware of her actions on the evening of February 2000.

On November 8, the judge highlighted Knight’s absence of remorse and the heinous nature of the crime, indicating the necessity of a severe punishment. Concluding the trial at the Newcastle Supreme Court, Justice O’Keefe delivered the verdict: “Katherine Mary Knight, you have pleaded guilty and been convicted of the murder of John Charles Price at Aberdeen on or about February 29, 2000. For your crime, I sentence you to imprisonment for life.” Refusing to set a non-parole period, the judge ordered that Knight’s papers be marked “never to be released.” This marked the first instance of such a verdict being imposed on a woman in Australian history. Presently, she is one of only four women in Australia with records bearing the note “Never to be released.”

Knight, one of eight children, claimed that her brothers had sexually assaulted her and alleged that her parents subjected her and her siblings to physical abuse using a dog leash and an electrical cord. She described her father, who worked at a slaughterhouse, as frequently hitting her mother, resulting in black eyes. However, forensic psychologists evaluating Knight remained skeptical of her accounts. Despite being diagnosed with both Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) by multiple psychiatrists, mental health professionals deemed her sane and competent to stand trial. While the judge who sentenced Knight acknowledged her BPD diagnosis, he noted that it did not fully explain the circumstances of the killing, which were influenced by factors beyond BPD. Although Knight reportedly became distressed when the prosecution presented details of Price’s dismemberment in court, she has never expressed remorse. The judge emphasized that Knight’s lack of contrition and potential danger to society warranted a life sentence, stating that she “poses a serious threat to the security of society.” Currently, Knight is incarcerated at the Silverwater Women’s Correctional Centre, a maximum-security facility in New South Wales housing some of Australia’s most dangerous female offenders.

In June 2006, Knight appealed her life sentence, arguing that a penalty of life in prison without the possibility of parole was excessively severe for the crime committed. However, her appeal was dismissed by Justices Peter McClellan, Michael Adams, and Megan Latham in the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal in September of the same year. Justice McClellan, in his judgment, described the crime as “appalling,” stating that it was “almost beyond contemplation in a civilised society.”

WHAT NOW?

Katherine Knight’s account of that fateful night starkly contrasts with the gruesome reality of the crime scene. While she claims to recall only the pleasant aspects of their encounter, the evidence presented during her trial painted a much darker picture. The horrific nature of the crime suggests that Knight’s memory loss may be a form of psychological self-defense, shielding her from confronting the full extent of her actions.

In prison, Knight’s role as a cleaner in the governor’s office keeps her away from kitchen duties, a wise decision given her past. Despite her culinary skills, her violent history likely makes her unsuitable for such a role. As she continues to serve her life sentence at Silverwater Women’s Correctional Centre, Knight remains a chilling reminder of the capacity for extreme violence within society.

Katherine Knight’s reputation within Silverwater Women’s Correctional Centre presents a complex and unsettling contrast. Despite her notorious nicknames, “Cannibal Kathy” and “Australia’s Hannibal Lecter”, and the chilling details of her crime, she has cultivated a persona of caring and maternal authority among fellow inmates. This transformation into “Nanna” and the “Queen Bee” suggests a capacity for adaptability and manipulation, traits that may have contributed to her ability to evade suspicion and perpetrate violence in the past.

While her model prisoner behavior may provide some reassurance to guards, Knight’s occasional attempts to intimidate other inmates with descriptions of her crimes serve as a stark reminder of her dark past. The dynamics of power and control that she exhibits behind bars echo the patterns of violence and dominance seen in her previous relationships.

Considering the possibility of childhood abuse and trauma, it’s crucial to acknowledge the complexity of Knight’s psyche and the potential interplay of factors contributing to her behavior. While understanding her past may provide insights into her actions, it does not absolve her of responsibility for the harm she inflicted on others.

TIMELINE OF VIOLENCE

Before I continue, let me just run through a timeline of Katherine Knight’s violent behaviour because it just astounds me that a) someone can get away with so much without being charged and b) that she never killed anybody before John Price. In the following timeline, I have also included some non-violent actions but they nonetheless demonstrate her vindictiveness.


CHILDHOOD

1968 – she was 13-years-old when she appeared before the Children’s Court on a minor charge and received a good behaviour bond

1968-1971 Katherine was by all accounts a pleasant girl who experienced uncontrollably murderous rages in response to minor upsets. At school, she was known for her violent temper.

1968 – 1971 She assaulted at least one boy at school with a weapon

1968 – 1971 and was once injured by a teacher – who was subsequently found to have acted in self-defence

ABATTOIR

1971 – Katherine took great interest in her job and would often wander over to the start of the production line and watch the pigs actually having their throats cut. Others noted that Knight had an unusual approach to her job, revelling in certain aspects of it. She would nick the arteries of the animals just to watch the blood come out.

KELLETT

1974 – She tries to strangle Kellett on their wedding night

1976 – Knight tried to stab David with a broken beer bottle

1976 – First admitted to psychiatric hospital after violently pushing her new baby’s pram down the street and almost onto oncoming traffic

1976 – Knight leaves her baby daughter, Melissa, on the railway tracks and walked away with the next train due any minute.

1976 – Knight is admitted for a second time to St Elmo’s Psychiatric hospital after threatening to kill people with an axe.

1976 – Knight kidnaps a neighbour to get her to drive to Kellett’s mother’s house. She planned to kill her. She slashed her neighbour’s daughter in the face

1976 – Knight is admitted for a third time into Morisset Psychiatric Hospital after holding a boy whilst waving a knife in the air. She had also intended to kill the mechanic because he had repaired Kellett’s car allowing him to leave her

1976 – 1980 Knight is seen by her sister-in-law forcing her daughter’s hand under a scalding hot tap

1976 – 1980 Knight fractures Kellett’s skull with a skillet

1980 – 1984 Fresh out of hospital, Knight stabs a police officer but WAS NOT CHARGED!!!

1980 – 1984 David wakes up with Knight sitting on his chest with a knife at his throat.

1980 – 1984 Knight cuts a 16 year old severely across her face and sent to hospital for the 4th time

SAUNDERS

1987 – Knight cuts the throat of Saunder’s puppy

1987 – 1990 Knight hits Saunders in the face with a hot iron

1987 – 1990 Knight attacks Kellett with a hot iron for coming home late

1987 – 1990 She stabs Saunders in the stomach with a pair of scissors

1987 – 1990 She arrives at her sister’s house with a shotgun saying that she had killed Saunders

1987 – 1990 Knight vandalised David’s car

1987 – 1990 Knight is admitted to a psychiatric hospital for the 5th time

1989 – 1990 Knight tells Saunder’s daughter that he is dead

1990 Knight takes out a restraining order against Saunders so that he couldn’t visit his daughter

CHILLINGWORTH

1990 There is only 1 violent event documented with Chillingworth where Knight smacks his glasses off his face and breaks his teeth

JOHN PRICE

1995 – 2000 Because Price refused to marry Knight, she sends a tape to his boss showing medical kits that he had taken from the company rubbish tip, getting him fired after 17 years

1995 – 2000 Knight tells friends on various occasions that she wanted to kill Price

1995 – 2000 Knight stabs John on a few occasions. We don’t have details of the different accounts but we do know that John showed friends stab wounds

1995 – 2000 Knight tells one of Price’s daughter that he was not her real father

1995 – 2000 Price’s children remember times when Knight would drive into a dog running across the road, instead of swerving to avoid it

1995 – 2000 She once asked her nephew to steal John’s car, burn it and then throw battery acid at John’s face.

2000 – Knight kills John Price

ENDSCREEN NOTES

Most articles and videos refer to Knight as a cannibal. I would have to disagree but at the same time liken her more to Ed Gein, the Butcher of Plainfield. Some of you might be thinking right now “Hang on…. He was a cannibal”. Well, that fact has actually not been confirmed. Again, many people assumed he was a cannibal but he categorically denied ever eating human flesh. His thing was the skin of his victims. He liked to wear the skin and Knight did something similar. I mean, she didn’t prance around the house wearing his skin but she certainly put it up on display. So there was a focus on his skin. However, there is also a Dahmer-esque quality about her, the way she decorated her living room with dead animals and any object associated with death. This display also reminded me of the Toy Box Killer, who was a sadistic monster. She certainly had a fascination with death and she was most probably desensitised through the years working at abattoirs.

Yes, she cooked him, but did she eat him? Maybe she never got the chance to, I don’t know. Would she have sat down with Price’s kids and ate what she had prepared? She was the one to send the children on a sleepover, so she knew they wouldn’t be returning anytime soon and this fact alone tells me that it was all for effect. She had no intention of feeding them his flesh. I feel this was more of an act of spite and vengeance with a bit of insanity plea preparation thrown in. She couldn’t do any more to Price. She had already done the ultimate. So the next best thing was his kids. Katherine Knight was consumed with resentment. My first impression was that she hated Price so much at this point that the ultimate punishment would be for his children to eat his flesh. But I don’t think it was directly to punish the children but the only thing left to punish Price. I think this was all part of her revenge and part of her insanity plea. It wouldn’t surprise me if the meat that was thrown in the garden was just for effect. Just a little addition to her made-up insanity.

Throughout my research on Knight, I have also learned from several sources that she disassociated herself from all the childhood trauma and I wonder if that is how she dismembered Price. Did she disassociate or did she treat it as one of her jobs at the abattoir? Or was this purely to set groundwork for her insanity plea? She had already confessed to her brother weeks before that she was planning to kill John and knew how to get away with it. “To kill him in such a way that no way will people think she is sane”

Thank you for watching. If you found this video informative and want to watch more from this channel, then hit that like button. It really helps to get this video out there to more people. It also tells youtube to show you my next video. If you don’t want to miss that, then subscribe so that you will be notified for sure. Also, consider supporting me b y subscribing to my patreon. Every little bit helps me to continue doing these videos… Thank you. Stay healthy. Stay safe and I’ll see you on my next video…

Scroll to Top